WATERBURY — Neil M. O’Leary, a mayor coping with his city’s legacy of deindustrialization, guided Gov. Ned Lamont through a 17-acre industrial fixer-upper with the optimistic patter of a developer. He urged the governor to look past the weeds and graffiti-tagged bricks and see potential.
Lamont peered into the dim emptiness of an abandoned 200,000 square-foot factory, a building with good bones and high ceilings that O’Leary says will save it from the demolition crews that are slowly creating clean slates from brownfields for the next act in what once was America’s Brass City.
With $3 million awarded by the administration of Lamont’s predecessor, the city has been clearing the site, once home to a metal hose company, Anamet. At least another $2 million is needed to finish. O’Leary told the governor about another abandoned factory, one reclaimed and back on the tax rolls, providing jobs.
“One of our primary partners is and has always been for the last seven and a half years the state of Connecticut,” O’Leary told Lamont after they moved on to a food-processing facility under construction nearby, soon to become a neighborhood source of jobs and food. “But we have the results to show for the work.”
Uncertain is the extent to which the Lamont administration will be a partner to Waterbury or other cities. Nine months into his tenure, the governor’s urban policy is a work-in-progress, intertwined with the administration’s still-unfolding efforts to rebuild Connecticut’s transportation infrastructure and grow its economy.
“I don’t think he has what we would classify as a formal urban agenda. That doesn’t mean that he doesn’t have one,” said Sen. Gary Winfield, D-New Haven, who says he can see the building blocks of an urban policy, even if it’s not yet articulated. “This administration is still young.”
Urban leaders like O’Leary, Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin and Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton say they are encouraged by the governor’s accessibility, his early interest in urban issues and his repeated assertion that cities are key to the economy. But the test will be seeing those sentiments turn into concrete action.
It is unclear who in the administration is responsible for urban policy. Lamont hesitated when asked to name his administration’s point person, mentioning his budget director, his chief operating officer and himself before settling on an answer outside his administration.
“I spend a lot of time talking to mayors. I spend a lot of time talking to Neil O’Leary. I spend a lot of time talking to Luke Bronin,” Lamont said. “That’s where I get my feedback. I think our point people are the mayors themselves.”
The mayors say communication has not been a problem.
“He texts frequently. He calls. He checks in,” said O’Leary, a Democrat who also is the current chair of the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities
“In that sense, he has been excellent to deal with,” said Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton, a Republican and former state legislator who sought the GOP nomination for governor in the last three election cycles. “They are feeling their way, post the first session.”
Money has not yet followed the conversations, however.
The legislature’s Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee recommended $30 million in bonding for brownfield remediation in the fiscal year that began July 1, but governor has refused to move forward on a bond package.
Lamont wants to first resolve how much of the state’s current credit capacity will be needed to finance CT 2030, a 10-year transportation infrastructure plan he expects to propose in the next week or so. It is a follow up to Lamont’s signal failure — a proposal for a comprehensive system of highway tolls that did come to a vote in either chamber.
“That’s kind of sucked the air out of the room,” Boughton said. “What they have to do is get that sense of equilibrium with the legislative branch. They are not there yet.”
The administration recently convened a working group on transit-oriented development in Fairfield County, and Lamont signed a bill that effectively makes federally designated opportunity zones, most of which are urban, a priority for state assistance.
“We are going to need to focus our resources on these areas,” said David Lehman, the governor’s economic adviser and his commissioner of economic and community development. Lehman has been working to recast the state’s economic aid programs away from corporate grants and toward investment in infrastructure.
Lehman said he sees the administration’s urban policy taking shape through a focus on opportunity zones, transit-oriented development and brownfield remediation.
In Hartford, the quasi-public Capitol Region Development Authority has been a catalyst for an apartment building boom that has transformed long-vacant buildings into downtown housing, a key ingredient for companies that see livable cities as key to attracting millennials and younger workers. Every dollar in public money the authority has provided in low-cost financing has leveraged four or five in private capital.
Bronin said the mayors know the governor recognizes that vibrant cities are necessary to economic growth.
Last week, Lamont told a legislative panel aimed at retaining young workers that Amazon is typical of what new-economy companies are demanding.
“We want cities that are alive,” said Lamont, repeating what he heard from Amazon. “They don’t have to be big cities, but we want cities that are alive. Cities that are alive with activities on the street. Cities that are walkable. Cities that are part of a major transportation hub.”